Faith – According to fellow Beardsman, John Calvin

Listen to this man. He is 500 years old this year. Don’t be a chronological snob, always thinking old means dumb or irrelevant. This man was a genius.
*A Trinitarian Foundation for Faith
After focusing on Christ and his gospel, God’s gratuitous promise of mercy, and the illumination of Holy Spirit, Calvin arrives at his final definition of faith: “Now we shall have a proper definition of faith if we say it is a steady and certain knowledge of the Divine benevolence toward us, which being founded upon the truth of the gratuitous promise in Christ is both revealed to our minds and sealed in or hearts by the Holy Spirit” (Institutes III.2.vii).
Calvin’s definition is concise and the content of the knowledge of faith is clear. Faith’s certainty is not founded on an argument or proposition, but founded on the work of the Trinity—God’s will to be benevolent toward us is revealed in the gratuitous promise because of Christ and applied by the Holy Spirit. The ground of certainty is God.
*Faith Rests on Knowledge
According to Calvin, in conversion the mind is renewed to appreciate the message of the Incarnation and to apprehend the gratuitous promise by Spirit-given faith, and the will is renewed in such a way that the person turns to God in piety and obedience. In his concept of faith, Calvin could not conceive of faith apart from knowledge: “Faith rests not on ignorance, but on knowledge” (Institutes III.2.ii). Knowledge of God is founded on particular self-disclosures of the Word of God and made effective through the persuasive, internally testifying, and illuminating work of the Holy Spirit in faith.
*More Than Ordinary Understanding
Calvin distinguishes between the knowledge of faith and ordinary intellectual comprehension: “When we call faith ‘knowledge,’ we do not mean comprehension of the sort that it commonly concerned with those things which fall under human sense perception” (Institutes III.2.xiv). Calvin appeals to the common distinction between seeing and believing, in which to believe is precisely not to see an object but to accept that object on the testimony of another. He cites Paul, “While dwelling in this body, we wander from the Lord, for we walk by faith, not sight (2 Cor. 5:6-7)” and comments as follows: “By these words he shows that those things which we know through faith are nonetheless absent from us and go unseen. From this we conclude that the knowledge of faith consists in assurance rather than comprehension” (Institutes III.2.xiv).
Calvin argues that humans can have knowledge of God only because God first accommodates to us in Christ and Scripture. He argues that humans cannot arrive, by themselves, at the truth about God. Left on our own, we are only good idolaters.
*Persuaded to Faith
That is why Calvin says we live in a space of acknowledgment or recognition, not knowledge, where the human calling is less to grasp than to be grasped. For Calvin, the knowledge of faith is more persuasion than cognition:
When we call faith “knowledge,” we do not mean comprehension of the sort that is commonly concerned with those things that fall under human sense perception. For faith is so far above sense that man’s mind has to go beyond and rise above itself in order to attain it. Even where the mind has attained, it does not comprehend what it perceives. But being persuaded of what that which it does not grasp, by the very certainty of this persuasion it understands more than if it perceived anything human by its own capacity… Those things which we know through faith are nonetheless absent from us and go unseen. From this we conclude that the knowledge of faith consists in assurance rather than in comprehension (Institutes III.2.xiv).
*Belief and Hope
This means that most of the time Christians do not know, we believe and hope. In his theology of faith, Calvin acknowledges the impossibility of securing the truthfulness of our knowledge of God in anything other than the revelation in Christ, which is illuminated and testified to by the Holy Spirit.
*these paragraphs are excerpts taken from Justin Holcomb’s Calvin on Faith Series found here.



















This is certainly thought provoking AND thoroughly confusing. I’m not at all sure what it means to distinguish between the knowledge of faith and ordinary intellectual comprehension. Though I certainly agree that, left to ourselves, we are only good idolaters. Nice way to put it, I think. Clearly Calvin was a genius. Wish we could sit down to a cold draft together with him!
I know (or don’t know). I am adding another paragraph after *More Than Ordinary Understanding – to possibly clear up the confusion with more mud. I’ve had to read each of these paragraphs several times. But I thought his idea of “knowing” was interesting and helpful. I’ve always struggled with whether or not it is proper to say “I know (such and such)” when it comes to a spiritual truth that is believed by faith. It seems like he is saying that you CAN say you “know” something, but it isn’t knowing in the way most people think of knowing. It is a Spirit-given knowing. Maybe it’s already knowing (Spirit-given), but not yet knowing (actually seeing and touching). Now I’m saying “knowing” so much that it’s losing its meaning altogether. Knowing, knowing, knowing, knowing, knowing…